RATHER SAD DAN: Former CBS News anchor Dan Rather says the climate of fear running through newsrooms is stronger than he has ever seen in his more than 40 years in journalism. In other words, the left's longstanding "we define reality as our worldview dictates" policy is today a tower whose ivory has been stripped away like a bad formica job. In further words, the culture that once gave Rather and his ilk leave to define as "news" as they pleased, is gone. Dan and his pals are scared — running scared.

Citing pressure to create "dumbed-down, tarted-up" coverage, Rather decries the creation of a "bigger atmosphere of fear in newsrooms." What Rather doesn't like is being called a moron or a con artist when his hamhanded attempt to pass off forged documents as real is exposed as a scheme worthy of The Marx Brothers. Rather pines for the day when the new media will be exposed as a passing fad, when Limbaugh, Drudge, Fox News and and the non-left Blogosphere will just pack up their tents and go away. He and his crowd devoutly long for the day when Republican leaders were get-along, go-along guys like Bob Michael, Hugh Scott, and Everett Dirkson.

Of course that's what he wants — but he ain't gonna get his way. The new media is here to stay; it will morph into forms not yet imagined. Dan's feeling weepy because his day has come and gone, and he knows a whole lot of influential, smart, sophisticated people see him for what he is: an empty trenchcoat waiting for the next storm.

In his landmark 1962 book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn argued that facts are embedded in social practices or “paradigms.” The old leftwing media and today's countervailing media forms are, in Kuhn’s sense, two fundamentally different paradigms that illuminate different kinds of phenomena, data, experiences, or apprehensions. Each paradigm brings forth different kinds of experience and different types of outcomes. Whenever a new (and real) paradigm enacts and brings forth new data, said Kuhn, the old worldviews and theories are thrown into a crisis. Practitioners of the old paradigm typically respond by rededicating themselves to business as usual and by dismissing the new paradigm as flawed, distorted, invalid, just plain wrong.

A paradigm shift occurs when a discipline reaches a crisis state that calls into question the explanatory powers of existing perspectives and practices. That's what's been happening in American media for more than a decade. Rush looked into his telescope and reported: Hey, everybody: the left isn't the center of the universe. Galileo got locked up for saying something like that. Rush? He got ratings — big time.

For a while, the left could get away with not copping to their own conceptual blindspots, projected outward in the form of contempt toward the new forms of media. They continue to wait for the new media to disappear so they can resume their rightful place on the throne. The most appropriate response: "Dan Rather? I knew you looked familiar. Didn't you used to be somebody?"